At the very least, you'll learn something. Honestly, I find rust really pleasant for writing small command line scripts, so if the libraries do what you need, give it a go. Rust makes you care about details you might not want to care about. Less mature ecosystem, means libraries probably won't handle minority use cases as well. structopt builds on top of clap.)Ĭompiled binary is (usually) easy to hand off to end users without asking them to install a runtime, and call the script in unusual ways.Ĭompile step makes iteration a little slower. is my favorite way of handling command line arguments. No "AttributeError: NoneType object has no attribute 'foo'" errors (Using `Option` instead of None response, and `Result` instead of exception handling)īlazing fast start-up times (especially noticeable on small scripts). I'm not clear on what you're using pandas for. Probably a little less robust, given how broadly used bs is, but it should do what you need. You probably don't need the async capabilities for what you're doing. Looks like a port to the async-std ecosystem. Seems to be the most maintained option of the crates I saw. One of the bigger disadvantages is that there aren’t as many mature options for some of the common things you wanna do in scripting. In Python, you have to run it to figure that out and often encounter runtime errors (even just simple spelling mistakes). In Rust, code is more likely to work if it compiles. In my own experience, they rarely have unit tests or integration tests. Scripts have a tendency to be built “hackily”. I’ve had scripts handed to me in both Python and Rust, and the Rust ones have been easier to wrap my head around and maintain. Scripting is only as powerful as the people using the script, and Rust scripts are something that can live on beyond your own work. Typed languages tend to be more self documenting (you can create aliasing types, for example). When I have encountered these fights in scripts, they’re often resolved quickly and my program is better for it. In simple scripts you very rarely come across painful fights with the borrow checker (these tend to only become archaic and confusing in larger more complex programs). I am using Mosquitto as an MQTT server and a Cubietruck board as hardware for OPENHAB and mosquitto.Personally, I have found that scripting in Rust is quite easy. minimal time later: all light MQTT message arrives.I now toggle the switch wait a little bit and trigger it again: 2-5 sec later: third light MQTT message arrives.2-5 sec later: second light MQTT message arrives.2-5 sec later: first light MQTT message arrives.switch is triggered, I can directly see the MQTT message. Fastscript makes everyone an online seller and we believe in. Let’s say, I have just started OPENHAB and the server is running for 10 minutes (everything is loaded, all should run smooth). Fastscript is a product design company and is developing a SaaS-based e-commerce platform. rule executes postUpdate commands to send MQTT messages to the lights.Those rules are mainly about light switches and lights. Basically, postToApplescript is a MetaWeblog. The Applescript then returns messages to the script and, in turn, to MarsEdit. It handles a small assortment of the most necessary MetaWeblog commands and forwards every message on to an Applescript. I have one rule file, roughly 5 designer pages long. It's a basic Python script that runs an XML-RPC server.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |